With a view to look at whether or not the Center East is an invention, you will need to look at the importance of British and French affect over the area. The autumn of the Ottoman Empire within the early 20th century marked the start of Western affect within the area and consequently created the ‘Center East’ that we all know at present. By analyzing the function the British and French had in shaping state boundaries and state formations, together with the social and geopolitical facets, it may be argued that the imperial rule of the British and French basically invented the Center East. Even the title coined for the area will be a sign of how the Center East will be understood as an invention. The time period Center East is a Eurocentric time period and was coined by the British in accordance with the proximity of the area to Europe. In consequence, the area will be interpreted in numerous methods and what international locations type the Center East is commonly a subject of debate, with many students opting to referring to the area as ‘West Asia’. This essay will argue that the Center East will be understood as an imperial invention, created by the European imperial powers by exploring insurance policies such because the Sykes-Picot Settlement and the mandate system, in addition to the area’s response to such insurance policies and the way additional time nationalist teams have contributed to the id of the area. Edward Mentioned’s ‘Orientalism’ can assist lots of the claims made on this essay and the insurance policies that are explored, demonstrating how Orientalist attitudes have performed a major function within the ‘invention’ of the Center East in addition to 21st century Western affect and intervention within the area.

Orientalism is important in understanding British and French actions concerning the Center East area and in understanding how the area got here to be ‘invented’ by international influences. Lockman argues that Orientalism discourse was linked to ‘modern European colonialism’ and was used as a type of justification by the European states to exert their energy over the area (Lockman, 2004: p.88). Edward Mentioned gives a spread of overlapping definitions of Orientalism, which might present perception into how Orientalism supported European energy’s imperial rule over the area. In addition to defining Orientalism as a ‘mode of discourse’, it’s also outlined as being ‘a mode of thought primarily based upon an ontological and epistemological distinction made between ‘the Orient’ and ‘the Occident’ (Mentioned, 1978: p.2). The distinctions made between the ‘Orient’ and the ‘Occident’, supported by a spread of literature, allowed for the West to current themselves as being superior to these within the Center East, offering them with a rationale to manage and have a powerful voice within the area and its affairs. Mentioned additionally defines Orientalism as a ‘company establishment for coping with the Orient – coping with it by making statements about it, authorizing views of it, describing it, by instructing, settling it, and ruling over it’(1978: p3). Basically making Orientalism ‘a Western model for dominating, restructuring and having authority over the Orient (Ibid.). As soon as once more, lots of the ‘statements’ or the preconceptions made concerning the Orient allowed the West to say their superiority over the area. Widespread Orientalist attitudes included the idea that the Center East was backwards and in determined want of civilising. It was this prejudice which justified the British and French colonial powers to implement Orientalist insurance policies, ‘reiterating European superiority over Oriental backwardness’ (Owen, 2004: p.7).

Nonetheless, the notion that the Center East requires civilising will not be a factor of the previous, and we are able to nonetheless see it within the 21st century, starting from US intervention in Afghanistan in 2001, through which the US claimed it will save Afghan girls from the Taliban to Macron’s latest visits to Lebanon following the Beirut explosion, which many considered as a ‘new colonial push’ (Ghitis, 2020). It was these Orientalist preconceptions of the Center East and its folks that supported lots of the insurance policies put forth by the British and French throughout the 20th century. Finally, this may enable the imperial powers to restructure, as urged by Mentioned, a area that may be thought of to be a ‘European invention’ (Burney, 2012: p. 23).

The 1916 Sykes-Picot Settlement, drawn up by the British and French, is a transparent indication of how the Center East will be considered as an ‘invention’. Following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, Britain and France carved up the area between the 2 imperial powers, creating their very own spheres of affect throughout the area. The British sphere of affect included Iraq, Transjordan, and Palestine. The French sphere of affect included Lebanon and Syria. It may be argued that by the instance of the Sykes-Picot Settlement that the boundaries of those states are an ‘invention […] determined by European powers beneath circumstances of colonial rule’ (Bilgin, 2016: p.357). One must also do not forget that the arbitrary borders had been imposed upon the individuals of the area and that they weren’t consulted within the creation of the Sykes-Picot Settlement. The drawing up of arbitrary borders will be understood as an Orientalist act because the colonial powers did not acknowledge that the Center East area was compromised of varied ethnic, linguistic and non secular teams. As an alternative, they blurred the varied identities of the area into one homogenous entity, which was higher suited to their pursuits. The impacts of the Sykes-Picot Settlement can nonetheless be felt within the area at present. For instance, the Kurdish individuals will be thought of to be victims of the Sykes-Picot Settlement, with Saeed arguing that the formation of a Kurdish state within the early 20th century could have ‘saved hundreds of thousands of lives and helped mitigate the chance of violence seen at present within the nation states that fashioned as by-products of Sykes-Picot settlement’ (Saeed, 2016). Immediately, the Kurdistan area is split between Turkey, Iraq and Syria, the place the ethnic group has turn into oppressed minorities, struggling for cultural and political rights throughout the states they dwell in. This means that state borders are usually not the one instance of how the Center East will be deemed an ‘invention’ but additionally that the Sykes-Picot Settlement is accountable for the divisions created amongst the individuals of the area and the conflicts that happen at present. The Sykes-Picot Settlement will be understood as a European try to determine a brand new area, disregarding the prevailing id of the area, linking to Mentioned’s notion of Orientalism because the West ‘restructuring’ the ‘Orient’ to enhance their very own pursuits. Due to this fact, the Sykes-Picot Settlement, which epitomised Orientalist attitudes, illustrates how the British and French imperial powers not solely invented the fashionable day boundaries of the Center East but additionally lots of its social and political points.

Equally, the Balfour Declaration of 1917 was one other instance of a coverage that was imposed on the individuals of the area. It additionally will be understood as the reason for the Palestine-Israel battle which has come to characterise the area; emphasising the notion that the various problems with the areas, together with state formation, will be instantly tied to the colonial powers of Britain and France. The Declaration known as for a ‘nationwide dwelling for Jewish individuals’ in Palestine and claimed that ‘nothing shall be achieved which can prejudice the civil and non secular rights of present non-Jewish communities in Palestine’ (The Palestinian Return Centre, 2017). The British and the Zionists, each concerned within the formation and implementation of the Declaration, used ‘Orientalist ideologies to justify their claims to the land’. Moreover, they used the Orientalist narrative that the ‘Orient’ is in want of civilising, claiming that the Palestinians had been ‘primitive and backwards, requiring modernisation’ (Pappé, cited in The Palestinian Return Centre, 2017). The Balfour Declaration validates Mentioned’s theories of Orientalism as utilizing discourse and establishing distinctions to legitimise management over the ‘Orient’. Over time, the Israeli state created a story claiming that the land previous to the Balfour Declaration lacked in commerce and infrastructure, and its individuals had been undemocratic and uncivilised. By means of this narrative, Israel was in a position to construct its credibility as a state, claiming that the Zionists and Jews who got here from Europe made the land ‘affluent, democratic and most significantly civilised’ (The Palestinian Return Centre, 2017). The sudden creation of the modern state of Israel, backed by Orientalist attitudes, led to social and political turmoil within the area which remains to be prevalent to at the present time. Thus, by the instance of the Balfour Declaration and its implications, we are able to additionally perceive Israel to be a British ‘invention’.

The mandate system, which adopted the Sykes-Picot Settlement, additional emphasises how the Center East was ‘invented’ by European powers and will be understood as an ‘instrument of political management’ (Owen, 2004: p.9). While the Sykes-Picot Settlement created new internationally recognised state boundaries, the mandate system ensured the creation of the nation-states, serving to to form the area politically and economically. The mandate system aimed to organize the newly fashioned states for eventual freedom and independence by making certain that they ‘undergo sure internationally sanctioned pointers’ and ‘set up constitutional governments’ (Owen, 2004: p.9). Due to this fact, even the trail to independence of latest Center Japanese states from the British and French performed a major function in shaping these nation-states, with Owen arguing that the mandate system had options of an ‘old school colony’ (Owen, 2004: p.9). It must be famous that the Center East’s expertise with the colonial powers differed to the experiences of British and French colonies throughout Asia and Africa. Nonetheless, like within the colonies, the British and French pushed to implement political and financial programs that might complement their very own vested pursuits within the area. For instance, the British applied constitutional monarchies inside their sphere of affect.

The British believed by establishing the Hashemite Kingdom in Iraq and Transjordan, it will guarantee assist for the British and for British affect within the new nation-states. In line with the British, a monarch created a component of stability and continuity in addition to being an necessary political actor, with some veto energy and the flexibility to suppress any nationalist uprisings or challenges to the political system beneath British mandate energy (Owen, 20014: p.16). The thought of stability and continuity is true to some extent, as Jordan at present remains to be a constitutional authorities. Equally, governance in Lebanon will be thought of to be a legacy of French ‘colonial’ rule. Not like the British, the French opted to implement a republic model of presidency. In distinction to how the Sykes-Picot ignored the very various area, the French designed the Lebanese authorities to supply political illustration for all Lebanese spiritual teams, with the president all the time being Christian Maronite, the prime minister a Sunni and the speaker of parliament a Shia. Thus, by the nation-states that exist throughout the Center East at present and their present establishments that had been applied by the imperial powers, it’s indicated that the area will be understood as an ‘invention’.

By utilizing Mentioned’s definition of Orientalism ‘as a Western model for dominating, restructuring and having authority over the Orient’ and by ‘instructing it’, we are able to come to grasp the mandate system as being a coverage or a system very a lot backed by Orientalist attitudes. European powers noticed the area as being unable to develop independently, in addition to being a geopolitical entity that they had been entitled to, permitting them to exert their affect over and ‘restructure’ the area. Once more, this was largely justified by the widespread Orientalist perception that the individuals of the ‘Orient’ had been backwards and in want of civilising and modernising, which was solely doable with assist from the ‘Occident’. Below French and British management, the area noticed a shift from being dominated beneath Islamic guidelines and pledging allegiance to Istanbul to the institution of the fashionable nation-state, with a centralised administration, authorized system, internationally recognised borders and a flag (Owen, 2004). Thus, one may argue that the Center Japanese nation-states that we see at present are an ‘invention’, created by the mandate powers.

Nonetheless, the argument that the Center East is solely an ‘invention’ of European powers will be deemed as problematic, because it reinforces Orientalist attitudes of the ‘Orient’ being unable to provide its personal id and having to depend on the ‘Occident’ for its data and energy. Orientalism means that the ‘Orient’ is mute, which is supported by Burney who claims that the Center East was created ‘by a hegemonic course of that robbed it of its true id, voice, and indigenous tradition’ (2012: p.26). Nonetheless, this notion will be challenged as individuals of the area didn’t settle for and welcome imperial rule. As an alternative, following the creation of the Sykes-Picot Settlement and the implementation of the mandate system, we start to see the emergence of nationalist actions. For instance, following the creation of the ‘nationwide dwelling for Jewish individuals’, Palestinians and Arabs violently opposed the Declaration and the identical battle for Palestinian sovereignty remains to be prevalent at present. The emergence of pan-Islamist teams such because the Muslim Brotherhood aimed to unite the Muslim world for the Palestinian trigger and the destruction of Israel. By claiming that the Center East is solely an imperial ‘invention’, we discredit the function nationalist actions performed in shaping the area’s id. It may be argued that pan-Arabism and pan-Islamism performed a major function in shaping the id of the Center East. These actions known as for a way of unity, whether or not it was spiritual or cultural, with the intention to problem Western affect within the area by appearing ‘in live performance in world politics’ to defend their pursuits (Hinnebusch, 2015: p.72). For instance, Nasserism and the Suez Disaster of 1956 marked the peak of pan-Arabism earlier than its fast demise following the Six Day Conflict in 1967. Nasser’s choice to nationalise the Suez Canal Firm instantly challenged British pursuits within the Center East and to some extent the Western capitalist order that they’d established within the area. The success of the nationalisation demonstrated to the Arab world that ‘enhanced affect in worldwide politics’ and ‘enchancment in residing requirements and financial alternatives’ will be achieved by ‘cooperation and solidarity amongst Arabs’ (Mellon, 2007: p.4). Due to this fact, it may be argued that transnational nationalist actions did play a job within the ‘invention’ of the Center East and the way it’s understood at present, because the actions created a shared Muslim and Arabic regional id that transcends the borders invented by the British and French.

Nonetheless, while nationalist teams had been in a position to problem Western imperialism to some extent, they weren’t in a position to dismantle the state boundaries or the idea of nation-states that had been applied by the British and French (Yamahata, 2018). As an alternative, it may be argued that the nationwide identities inspired by such actions accepted and legitimised the nation-state that had been invented by the mandate powers. Equally, the decision to determine a shared Arabic or Muslim id past borders additionally acknowledged and to some extent accepted the imposed state boundaries. Due to this fact, the Center East largely stays an imperial ‘invention’ as nationalist actions had been unable to efficiently deconstruct the establishments and limits that had been imposed upon them and have now turn into embedded within the area.

As beforehand talked about, Orientalism will not be a factor of the previous and remains to be related to the modern-day Center East. Orientalist views nonetheless function a basis for reasoning and justification of Western intervention within the area at present. For instance, Orientalist perceptions typically depict Islam as ‘anti-rational and anti-scientific’, incapable of progressing with social modifications (Lockman, 2009: p.79) and that its leaders are tyrants. It additionally views girls of the area as being oppressed by the patriarchal society and the tradition of the Center East. It’s these preconceptions that immediate and justify Western intervention within the area. For instance, the US ‘Conflict on Terror’ was justified by the declare that ‘the struggle in opposition to terrorism can also be a struggle for the rights and dignity of ladies’ (Flanders, 2001). The Center East is continually being reinvented by Western interference within the area, whether or not it’s by direct army intervention or Western neocolonialsim. An instance of neocolonialsim within the area is the US and its latest insurance policies beneath the Trump Administration. For instance, the latest US-brokered offers which have seen 4 Arab states normalising ties with Israel reinforces the Orientalist notion that the area depends on Western data and energy in its affairs. Moreover, the function the US has performed within the normalisation of relations underscores the Orientalist notion of the West ‘authorizing’ insurance policies and ‘instructing’ the states within the area how they need to work together, thus ‘settling’ any disputes and pressure (Mentioned, 1978: p.3). It is for that reason that it may be argued that Western hegemony within the area nonetheless exists and consequently, the Center East continues to be (re)invented or ‘restructured’.

In conclusion, by analyzing how Orientalism served as a foundation of thought and justification for the development of the area, it may be argued that ‘the Orient was manufactured by the West by the tropes of information and energy as the final word Different of the Occident’ (Burney, 2012: p. 24), thus making the Center East an ‘invention’. Orientalism will be outlined as a Western model for dominating, restructuring, and having authority over the ‘Orient’ and offers an ‘ontological and epistemological distinction’ between these of the ‘Orient’ and people of the ‘Occident’ (Mentioned, 1973: pp.2-3). This essay has argued that Orientalism data was the muse of lots of the insurance policies applied within the area. Moreover, it has proven how the Center East got here to be an ‘invention’ created by Orientalist-backed attitudes of the European imperial powers Britain and France. By means of the Sykes-Picot Settlement and the mandate system, Britain and France helped to determine the foundations of the nation-states within the area that proceed to stay at present. The imperial powers additionally created the time period ‘Center East’ as a result of its geographical location and shut proximity to Europe. Moreover, this essay explored how the Orientalist-backed insurance policies of the European powers contributed largely to a lot of the social and political turmoil that characterises the area at present. The presence of the West within the area from the early 20th century helped to determine an influence hierarchy within the area, supported by Orientalist attitudes, presenting the West to be superior. This concept of West superiority and the facility hierarchy it has created in worldwide politics is what permits Western states to intervene within the area at present, which has been demonstrated by occasions such because the ‘Conflict on Terror’ and the latest US-brokered offers which noticed some Arab states normalising relations with Israel. Just like the 20th century, Western intervention within the area stays to be backed by the identical Orientalist attitudes that the area requires civilising and modernising, which might solely be achieved by steerage from Western states. Though nationalist actions have performed a major function in creating the id of the Center East area and its respective nation-states, they’ve but to eradicate embedded imperial innovations within the Center East. Thus, the Center East will be recognised as an invention of European colonial powers and their Orientalist attitudes.


Bilgin, P. (2016). What’s the Level about Sykes–Picot? [online] World Affairs. Accessible at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/citedby/10.1080/23340460.2016.1236518?scroll=top&needAccess=true [Accessed 7 Dec. 2020].

‌Burney, S. (2012). “Orientalism: The Making of the Different.” Counterpoints, vol. 417, pp. 23–39. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/42981698. [Accessed 7 Dec. 2020].

Encyclopedia.com (2013). British–French Oil Settlement | Encyclopedia.com. [online] Accessible at: https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/british-french-oil-agreement#:~:text=agreement%20that%20placed%20palestine%20and,of%20the%20League%20of%20Nations. [Accessed 11 Dec. 2020].

Flanders, L. (2001). Past the Burqa: The Rights Ladies Want in Afghanistan are Primary Human Rights. [online] Commondreams.org. Accessible at: https://archive.commondreams.org/scriptfiles/views01/1214-03.htm [Accessed 13 Dec. 2020].

Ghitis, F. (2020). For France’s Macron, Lebanon’s Chief ‘Betrayed’ Their Dedication To Reform. [online] Worldpoliticsreview.com. Accessible at: <https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/29099/for-france-s-macron-lebanon-s-leader-betrayed-their-commitment-to-reform> [Accessed 28 November 2020].

Hinnebusch, R. (2015). The Worldwide Politics of the Center East. [online] Venture Muse. Accessible at: https://muse-jhu-edu.ezproxy.soas.ac.uk/book/51390 [Accessed 10 Dec. 2020].

Mellon, J.G. (2007). Pan‐Arabism, Pan‐Islamism and Inter‐State Relations within the Arab World. [online] Taylor&Francis On-line. Accessible at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13537110208428675 [Accessed 13 Dec. 2020].

‌Jazeera, A. (2011). A Century On: Why Arabs Resent Sykes-Picot. [online] Aljazeera.com. Accessible at: https://interactive.aljazeera.com/aje/2016/sykes-picot-100-years-middle-east-map/index.html [Accessed 2 Dec. 2020].

Jazeera, A. (2020). Israel, Morocco Comply with Normalise Relations in US-brokered Deal. [online] Aljazeera.com. Accessible at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/12/10/israel-morocco-agree-to-normalise-relations-in-us-brokered-deal [Accessed 13 Dec. 2020].

Lockman, Z. (2004). “Orientalism and empire”, Contending Visions of the Center East: The Historical past and Politics of Orientalism. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press (The Modern Center East), pp. 66–98. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511606786.010.

Saeed, Y. (2016). Who to Blame for the Absence of a Kurdish State after Sykes Picot? [online] Washingtoninstitute.org. Accessible at: https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/fikraforum/view/who-to-blame-for-the-absence-of-a-kurdish-state-after-sykes-picot [Accessed 3 Dec. 2020].

Saouli, A. (2019). “States and State-building within the Center East”, The Routledge Handbook to the Center East and North African State and States System, Routledge [Accessed on: 10 Dec 2020].

Schmidt, S. (2014). The Framed Arab/Muslim: Mediated Orientalism, (Re-)Framing the Arab/Muslim: Mediating Orientalism in Modern Arab American Life Writing, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. Retrieved November 27, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1xxs1s.6 [Accessed 3 Dec. 2020].

Stork, J. (1972). “Understanding the Balfour Declaration”, MERIP Experiences, (13), pp. 9-13.

The Palestinian Return Centre (2017). The Making of the Balfour Declaration. [online] Accessible at: https://prc.org.uk/upload/library/files/Balfour1CCNewSS.pdf [Accessed 9 Dec. 2020].

Yamahata, Y. (2018). (Re)Shaping Territories to Identities: Is the Center East a Colonial Invention? [online] E-Worldwide Relations. Accessible at: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/10/07/reshaping-territories-to-identities-is-the-middle-east-a-colonial-invention/ [Accessed 13 Dec. 2020].

Written at: SOAS, College of London
Written for: Dr. Arshin Adib-Moghaddam
Date written: December 2020

Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations